.png)
Mimecast Integration Guide
Connect Mimecast security, directory, archive, and message operations with enterprise systems through REST APIs and controlled Martini workflows.
Mimecast integration options at a glance
Mimecast primarily integrates through service-specific REST APIs covering administration, directory, email security, archive, continuity, monitoring, and reporting. API 2.0 uses OAuth-style application authorization where available, while older API 1.0 operations may require signed requests and application credentials. Mimecast uses region-specific API hosts, so the endpoint should be environment configuration. General webhook coverage, universal bulk APIs, direct database access, and a general-purpose attachment API were not confirmed. Martini can consume the documented REST resources, schedule polling workflows, paginate and filter collections, transform responses, apply business rules, and expose a controlled REST API for archive or security operations.
Common Mimecast integration patterns
Common Mimecast data objects used in integrations
Authentication and security considerations
Version-aware authentication
Mimecast API 2.0 uses OAuth 2.0-style application authorization where available. Older API 1.0 operations may require application credentials, access credentials, request identifiers, timestamps, expiration values, and signed requests. The workflow must use the authentication model required by the selected resource.
Secrets and permissions
Store client secrets, tokens, application keys, access keys, and signing secrets in protected Martini secrets or environment configuration. Use region-specific API hosts and request only the permissions required for each integration domain.
Sensitive email data
- Restrict archive, message, and held-message operations to authorized workflows and callers.
- Minimize retention of message bodies, recipients, URLs, and attachments.
- Never write credentials, tokens, signing secrets, or unnecessary message content to logs.
Operational considerations for Mimecast integrations
Pagination and synchronization
Collection endpoints may return limited result sets. Use documented pagination, continuation markers, filters, date windows, and persisted watermarks. Advance a checkpoint only after successful downstream processing.
Rate limits and retries
Design for throttling, transient HTTP errors, and regional service interruptions. Use bounded retries with backoff and avoid repeating non-idempotent operations without a replay strategy.
Idempotency and auditability
Use source identifiers and deterministic correlation keys for directory updates, incident creation, message actions, and reporting. Record operation type, tenant or region context, correlation identifiers, outcome, and workflow execution details.
Schema and API changes
Mimecast service areas can evolve independently. Use tolerant JSON mappings, validate required fields, monitor response changes, and test API-version or permission changes before production rollout.
Archive and attachment scope
Use narrow archive criteria and confirm attachment behavior for the selected operation. A general-purpose file or attachment API was not confirmed.
Why use Martini instead of scripts or point-to-point integrations?
Orchestration instead of isolated scripts
Mimecast integrations often combine authentication, pagination, filtering, transformation, target writes, and audit requirements. Martini represents that behavior as maintainable workflows and APIs rather than distributing it across one-off scripts.
Reusable integration logic
Common pagination, validation, mapping, checkpoint, and error-handling behavior can be reused across directory, message, archive, and security workflows while service-specific rules remain explicit.
Controlled enterprise access
Martini can expose a restricted API façade for archive or security operations, apply authorization and data-minimization rules, and keep credentials in protected configuration. This reduces the need for each consuming application to implement Mimecast authentication independently.
Operational reliability
Scheduled execution, retry paths, idempotency keys, monitoring, and deployment configuration provide a consistent operational model for Mimecast integrations that would otherwise be maintained separately in point-to-point code.